Terrible threes?

As I scrolled through the new posts in my WordPress reader this morning, I came across this: 10 Reasons Age Three is More Terrible Than Two

I had to smile. This article, along with the comments on my last post and some other blog posts I’ve read recently, make me feel a bit better. At least I know I’m not alone in my battle with a three-year-old!

Over the last year, I often wondered about the “terrible twos”. It never really happened to my son. Sure, he had his moments, but it was never really “terrible.” Now I’m learning that three might just be the harder age. They’re smarter, able to communicate more and have figured out how to use those skills against us more successfully.

As I realize that Littleman is acting like a pretty normal three-year-old, I think my ability to handle his freak-outs will get better. He’s not turning into a monster child. He isn’t going to have lifelong behavioural issues (I hope!). He’s just a little kid who has had lots of changes in his life recently and is testing boundaries as he tries to cope with his feelings.


2 thoughts on “Terrible threes?

  1. Yep! I’ve also found that 3 has been more challenging. More amazing, and more difficult. These little ones, they keep you on your toes – just when you think you’ve got it down, they change it up.

  2. Pingback: Oh, the injustice! | Another bun (in the oven)?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s